Which of the following can be used to implement side-by-side extensions in the Cloud Foundry environment of SAP Business Technology Platform? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Question

Options

• AABAP
• BJava
• CNode.
• Djs ActionScript

• A
  9% (3)
• B
  88% (29)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Side-by-side extensions in SAP BTP's Cloud Foundry environment are built using runtimes supported by Cloud Foundry buildpacks, and both Java (B) and Node.js (C) are natively supported runtimes with official buildpacks in that environment - making them valid choices for developing decoupled extension applications alongside core SAP systems.

ABAP (A) is incorrect because ABAP runs in the ABAP environment on BTP, not in Cloud Foundry; it's used for in-app extensions, not the Cloud Foundry-based side-by-side model. ActionScript (D) is a scripting language historically tied to Adobe Flash/Flex and has no relevance to SAP BTP or Cloud Foundry runtimes whatsoever.

Memory tip: Think "CF = Cloud Foundry = standard web runtimes" - Java and Node.js are the two most common enterprise web development stacks and are the cornerstone languages for CF-based extension development on BTP. If a language runs a web server and has a CF buildpack, it belongs here.

No community discussion yet for this question.