Which of the following customizing prerequisites are necessary for the integration of a Sales and Distribution billing document into a convergent invoicing document? Note: There are 2 correct…

Question

Options

• ASales and Distribution material is mapped to relevant BIT type
• BActivate invoice function INV_VBRK_DOC
• CSales and Distribution Billing calculation scheme includes Main Transaction
• DPosting to Fi-CA is defined for Customer Accounting Group

• A
  7% (5)
• B
  76% (52)
• C
  16% (11)

Explanation

Integrating SD billing into convergent invoicing requires activating invoice function INV_VBRK_DOC (B) because this function explicitly enables the system to recognize and transfer SD billing document headers (VBRK table) into the convergent invoicing framework - without activating it, the integration pathway simply doesn't exist. Defining FI-CA postings for the Customer Accounting Group (D) is equally required because convergent invoicing must know how to route the resulting financial postings into FI-CA; without this configuration, the document cannot be settled.

Option A is a distractor - mapping SD materials to BIT types relates to how billing items are categorized within convergent invoicing itself, not to the prerequisite setup for document integration. Option C is also incorrect - the SD pricing procedure (calculation scheme) handles condition-based pricing logic, while Main Transaction is an FI-CA account determination concept; the two do not need to be combined in the SD scheme as a prerequisite for this integration.

Memory tip: Think of the acronym "ID" - you must Invoke the function (activate INV_VBRK_DOC) and Define the posting (FI-CA for Customer Accounting Group). These two steps "identify" the integration channel and its financial destination.

No community discussion yet for this question.