Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network. You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following table. The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints. You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts. Solution: On Server2, you create a conditional forwarder for west.contoso.local. On Server3, you create a conditional forwarder for east.contoso.local. Does this meet the goal?

Question

Accepted Answer

B. No The solution is insufficient because DNS servers that host only the contoso.local zone with delegations, and rely on root hints for everything else, cannot resolve east.contoso.local or west.contoso.local unless the servers hosting those delegated zones are reachable and delegation NS records are valid; a missing forwarder or stub zone for the delegated namespaces leaves at least one server unable to fully resolve all required names.

Answer

A. Yes The proposed solution does not fully meet the stated goals because its configuration leaves a resolution gap for at least one internal namespace or internet name across the DNS servers.

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might…

Question

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion