AZ-104 · Question #218
Case Study 2 - Contoso, Ltd Overview Contoso, Ltd. is a manufacturing company that has offices worldwide. Contoso works with partner organizations to bring products to market. Contoso products are…
The scenario explicitly requires Azure Blob storage for blueprint files, with no stated requirement for Table or File storage.
Question
Exhibit
Answer Area
- Contoso requires a storage account that supports Blob storage.
- Contoso requires a storage account that supports Azure Table storage.
- Contoso requires a storage account that supports Azure File Storage.
Explanation
The scenario explicitly requires Azure Blob storage for blueprint files, with no stated requirement for Table or File storage.
Approach. 1. For 'Contoso requires a storage account that supports Blob storage', select Yes. The 'Planned Changes' section explicitly states the requirement to 'Move the existing product blueprint files to Azure Blob storage.' 2. For 'Contoso requires a storage account that supports Azure Table storage', select No. There is no mention in the case study of a need for NoSQL key/value data storage. 3. For 'Contoso requires a storage account that supports Azure File Storage', select No. While the company currently has on-premises file servers, the planned migration specifically targets Blob storage for the blueprint files, and no requirement for SMB/NFS file shares in Azure is listed.
Common mistakes.
- common_mistake. A common mistake is selecting 'Yes' for Azure File Storage because the 'Existing Environment' lists 'File servers'. However, test-takers must follow the explicitly stated 'Planned Changes', which dictate moving those files specifically to Blob storage, not Azure Files.
Concept tested. Mapping business and technical requirements to appropriate Azure Storage services (Blob, Table, File).
Reference. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/common/storage-introduction
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
