Which 2 statements describe the appropriate application of Agile Project Management when developing the Prioritised Requirements List during Feasibility?

Question

Exhibit

Options

• ADetails of which areas will require seeding in order to become lawn, and which are to become
• BThe re-laying of the driveway and a landscaping solution should be listed as Must Have
• CThe scope of the project should be agreed before moving into the Foundations phase.
• DThe responsibility for setting the priority of each of the requirements identified should be assigned
• ERegulatory obligations associated with the redevelopment of Hoy Hall should be recorded as Must

• A
  7% (4)
• B
  77% (44)
• C
  12% (7)
• D
  4% (2)

Explanation

In the context of Agile Project Management when developing the Prioritised Requirements List during Feasibility, the two statements that align with Agile principles are: B . The re-laying of the driveway and a landscaping solution should be listed as Must Have E . Regulatory obligations associated with the redevelopment of Hoy Hall should be recorded as Must Have requirements. Here's the rationale: B: In Agile, requirements are often categorized by priority such as "Must Have", "Should Have", "Could Have", and "Won't Have for now" (the MoSCoW method). The re-laying of the driveway and a landscaping solution are essential for the project's success and thus should be classified as "Must Have". E: Regulatory requirements are non-negotiable constraints that the project must adhere to. These should always be prioritized in the requirements list to ensure compliance and to avoid legal issues, making them "Must Have" items as well.

No community discussion yet for this question.