Which 2 statements explain why the Timber Tigers' Site Manager would be an appropriate Solution Developer?

Question

Options

• AAccustomed to bringing in contract staff for short periods of time.
• BClosely manages the building team so that they consistently produce high-quality work.
• CIs able to represent the team in all daily meetings.
• DAn experienced builder who is good at turning a brief into a practical design.
• EIs empowered by Timber Tigers' management to make decisions on the building work.

• A
  5% (1)
• B
  80% (16)
• C
  10% (2)
• E
  5% (1)

Explanation

In the DSDM (Dynamic Systems Development Method) framework, a Solution Developer's core purpose is to interpret requirements and build a high-quality solution. Option D directly matches this - the Site Manager's ability to turn a brief (requirements) into a practical design is exactly what Solution Developers do. Option B reinforces suitability because Solution Developers are responsible for the quality of their output, and closely managing the team to ensure consistent quality demonstrates this ownership.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (contract staff) describes a resourcing/management capability, not a Solution Developer competency.
• C (representing the team in meetings) describes a coordination or facilitation role - closer to a Team Leader or Technical Coordinator function.
• E (empowered to make decisions) sounds appealing but describes a Business Ambassador or empowered decision-maker role, not a Solution Developer - who implements, rather than authorises.

Memory tip: Think of a Solution Developer as a "builder-translator" - they translate briefs into solutions (D) and are accountable for the quality of what gets built (B). If an answer is about authority, meetings, or staffing, it's describing a different DSDM role.

No community discussion yet for this question.