What steps are involved in reviewing existing components for migration?

Question

Options

• AAutomatic migration without assessment.
• BSkipping review for faster migration.
• CReviewing code structure only.
• DCompatibility assessment and functional testing.

• A
  5% (2)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  13% (5)
• D
  80% (32)

Explanation

Compatibility assessment and functional testing (D) captures the two essential gates in any component migration review: first confirming the component is compatible with the target environment, framework version, or API surface, then verifying it still behaves correctly after changes. Option A is wrong because skipping assessment is how migrations silently break production - automation can move code, but it cannot judge whether that code belongs in the new context. Option B trades speed for correctness in the worst possible way; skipping review means defects surface in production rather than in a controlled review phase. Option C is a half-measure - code structure tells you how something is written, but not whether it works or integrates safely with the new system.

Memory tip: Think of the acronym CF - Check fit (compatibility assessment), then Confirm function (functional testing). Migration without both steps is like moving furniture without measuring the doorway or testing if it still opens drawers.

No community discussion yet for this question.