AD0-E136 · Question #1
A client's AEM environment uses a large number of custom workflows that involve deprecated functionality. What is the most effective approach to address this during assessment?
The correct answer is B. Review and refactor custom workflows to align with supported capabilities. Reviewing and refactoring custom workflows (B) is correct because it ensures continuity of business processes while modernizing them to use supported, stable APIs - this is the only approach that preserves functionality AND resolves the underlying technical debt before…
Question
A client's AEM environment uses a large number of custom workflows that involve deprecated functionality. What is the most effective approach to address this during assessment?
Options
- ADisable all custom workflows before migration
- BReview and refactor custom workflows to align with supported capabilities
- CMigrate the workflows without any modifications
- DImplement temporary solutions for unsupported features
How the community answered
(30 responses)- A20% (6)
- B67% (20)
- C10% (3)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
Reviewing and refactoring custom workflows (B) is correct because it ensures continuity of business processes while modernizing them to use supported, stable APIs - this is the only approach that preserves functionality AND resolves the underlying technical debt before migration.
Why the distractors fail:
- A - Disabling workflows eliminates business processes entirely, which is rarely acceptable and solves nothing long-term.
- C - Migrating without modification carries deprecated functionality into the new environment, creating instability and future breakage.
- D - Temporary workarounds just defer the problem, accumulating more technical debt post-migration.
Memory tip: Think of it as "fix the foundation, not just the walls" - deprecated code is a structural issue that must be resolved (refactored) before you build on top of it, not patched or ignored.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.