AAIA · Question #2
An organization is adopting AI for its procurement and inventory teams, raising concern from stakeholders that they will lose their jobs due to AI. Which of the following is the BEST way for the IS…
The correct answer is A. Review human-centered design practices to determine how they were considered. Human-centered design (HCD) practices explicitly account for how technology affects people, including workforce displacement concerns. Reviewing whether HCD practices were applied tells the auditor whether human impacts were systematically considered and addressed throughout…
Question
An organization is adopting AI for its procurement and inventory teams, raising concern from stakeholders that they will lose their jobs due to AI. Which of the following is the BEST way for the IS auditor to assess whether the potential negative impacts were minimized?
Options
- AReview human-centered design practices to determine how they were considered.
- BReview the AI roadmap for short-term and long-term milestones.
- CReview how the project management team collected feedback in engagement activities.
- DReview the current state assessment of how AI may impact the organization.
How the community answered
(22 responses)- A64% (14)
- B5% (1)
- C9% (2)
- D23% (5)
Explanation
Human-centered design (HCD) practices explicitly account for how technology affects people, including workforce displacement concerns. Reviewing whether HCD practices were applied tells the auditor whether human impacts were systematically considered and addressed throughout the design and adoption process. Reviewing the AI roadmap (B) shows timelines and milestones but not how human concerns were handled. Reviewing feedback collection (C) only evaluates process engagement, not whether negative impacts were actually minimized. Reviewing the current state assessment (D) is backward-looking and descriptive, not an evaluation of mitigation efforts.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.