A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network. Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see "intercept/localkernel/icorre.c:1463] nat_check: SYN packet for already NAT'd connection 100.100.100.33:1611 - 100.200.200.32:80 == 100.201.201.25:7801". All connections are showing up optimized but the logs persist. Given the exhibit, what is the likely problem?

Question

A customer is reporting higher than normal CPU utilization on certain routers in their network. Looking at their Steelhead appliance logs, they see "intercept/localkernel/icorre.c:1463] nat_check: SYN packet for already NAT'd connection 100.100.100.33:1611 -> 100.200.200.32:80 ==> 100.201.201.25:7801". All connections are showing up optimized but the logs persist. Given the exhibit, what is the likely problem?

Accepted Answer

E. Packet Ricochet

Answer

A. Lost Opportunistic Lock

Answer

B. SMB Signing

Answer

C. Fixed-target rule is needed

Answer

D. Asymmetric Route

830-01 Question #170: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

Question

Options

Community Discussion