nerdexam
Microsoft

77-884 · Question #235

You work as a Developer at ABC.com. Employees at ABC.com use computers running Windows 7 Enterprise and Microsoft Office 2010. The company email system runs Microsoft Exchange Server 2010. All…

The correct answer is B. The file was blocked because it is an executable (.exe) file. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.

Question

You work as a Developer at ABC.com. Employees at ABC.com use computers running Windows 7 Enterprise and Microsoft Office 2010. The company email system runs Microsoft Exchange Server 2010. All company employees use Microsoft Outlook 2010 for their email clients. You attach a file to a new email message and send it to another employee. However, when you send the email, you are presented with a warning stating that the email has a potentially unsafe attachment that the recipient might not be able to open and enquiring whether you want to send the email anyway. You click the Yes button and the email is sent successfully. The recipient informs you that he cannot open the attached file. What is the most likely reason that the recipient cannot open the attachment?

Options

  • AYou entered the recipients email address incorrectly.
  • BThe file was blocked because it is an executable (.exe) file.
  • CThe recipient is using an older version of Microsoft Outlook.
  • DYou sent the email using the HTML format.

How the community answered

(34 responses)
  • A
    3% (1)
  • B
    82% (28)
  • C
    9% (3)
  • D
    6% (2)

Community Discussion

8
Imani T.Imani T.Dec 30, 2025

The answer is B. Outlook 2010 has a built-in attachment blocking feature that flags certain file types as potentially unsafe, and executable files like .exe are on that blocked list by default. When you saw that warning about an unsafe attachment and clicked Yes anyway, Outlook still sent the email, but the recipient's Outlook client blocked the .exe on the receiving end because of its own security settings. The warning you got was Outlook's way of telling you exactly what was about to happen, and the outcome confirmed it. The other options do not fit because a wrong email address would result in a delivery failure or bounce, not a successful delivery where the recipient just cannot open the file, and HTML format has nothing to do with attachment blocking.

30
Dragomir B.Dragomir B.Dec 23, 2025

B, obviously. That warning is Outlook's Level 1 attachment block talking, not some mystery.

2
Luis F.Luis F.Dec 12, 2025

Saw almost this exact scenario on my exam last month and I almost went with C because I figured maybe his Outlook was outdated, but then I remembered that Outlook 2010 has a built-in attachment blocker that flat out blocks .exe files on the receiving end even if the sender gets through with just a warning. B is your answer, the recipient's Outlook silently blocked it because .exe is on the unsafe attachment list by default.

0
Nina C.Nina C.Dec 13, 2025

Right, and the part that helped it click for me is that the sender's side only throws a warning because sending is not the same as executing, but Outlook classifies .exe as a Level 1 restricted file type on the receiving end, so the recipient never even gets a chance to open it.

0
Grace U.Grace U.Jan 5, 2026

Older Outlook cannot open attachments sent from a newer version, so C.

0
Luis F.Luis F.Jan 8, 2026

Hey Grace, totally see where you're coming from but the version difference actually affects how the message body renders, not the attachments themselves, which points to B. Attachments are handled separately from the message format, so older Outlook can still open them fine.

0
Nina C.Nina C.Dec 18, 2025

Pretty sure it is C, older Outlook just cannot open that.

-1
Dragomir B.Dragomir B.Dec 19, 2025

Nina, appreciate the input but you need the question in front of me to get a useful correction here, and you did not paste it. Drop the full question text and I will tell you exactly why B is correct.

0
Full 77-884 Practice