77-884 · Question #235
You work as a Developer at ABC.com. Employees at ABC.com use computers running Windows 7 Enterprise and Microsoft Office 2010. The company email system runs Microsoft Exchange Server 2010. All…
The correct answer is B. The file was blocked because it is an executable (.exe) file. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Options
- AYou entered the recipients email address incorrectly.
- BThe file was blocked because it is an executable (.exe) file.
- CThe recipient is using an older version of Microsoft Outlook.
- DYou sent the email using the HTML format.
How the community answered
(34 responses)- A3% (1)
- B82% (28)
- C9% (3)
- D6% (2)
Community Discussion
8The answer is B. Outlook 2010 has a built-in attachment blocking feature that flags certain file types as potentially unsafe, and executable files like .exe are on that blocked list by default. When you saw that warning about an unsafe attachment and clicked Yes anyway, Outlook still sent the email, but the recipient's Outlook client blocked the .exe on the receiving end because of its own security settings. The warning you got was Outlook's way of telling you exactly what was about to happen, and the outcome confirmed it. The other options do not fit because a wrong email address would result in a delivery failure or bounce, not a successful delivery where the recipient just cannot open the file, and HTML format has nothing to do with attachment blocking.
B, obviously. That warning is Outlook's Level 1 attachment block talking, not some mystery.
Saw almost this exact scenario on my exam last month and I almost went with C because I figured maybe his Outlook was outdated, but then I remembered that Outlook 2010 has a built-in attachment blocker that flat out blocks .exe files on the receiving end even if the sender gets through with just a warning. B is your answer, the recipient's Outlook silently blocked it because .exe is on the unsafe attachment list by default.
Right, and the part that helped it click for me is that the sender's side only throws a warning because sending is not the same as executing, but Outlook classifies .exe as a Level 1 restricted file type on the receiving end, so the recipient never even gets a chance to open it.
Older Outlook cannot open attachments sent from a newer version, so C.
Hey Grace, totally see where you're coming from but the version difference actually affects how the message body renders, not the attachments themselves, which points to B. Attachments are handled separately from the message format, so older Outlook can still open them fine.
Pretty sure it is C, older Outlook just cannot open that.
Nina, appreciate the input but you need the question in front of me to get a useful correction here, and you did not paste it. Drop the full question text and I will tell you exactly why B is correct.