Which statement about the SIP Entities to support Avaya Aura® Presence Services is true?

Question

Options

• AOnly one SIP Entity is built of Type = "Presence Services", which uses the SM100 IP address of
• BOnly one SIP Entity is built of Type = "Engagement Development Platform", which uses the
• CTwo SIP Entities are built to the same SM100 IP address of each node. One is of Type =
• DTwo SIP Entities are built to the same SM100 IP address of each node. One is of Type =

• A
  5% (3)
• B
  91% (51)
• C
  2% (1)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Option B is correct because Avaya Aura® Presence Services is supported through a single SIP Entity configured with the Type = "Engagement Development Platform" (EDP) - this reflects how Presence Services functionality is architecturally tied to the EDP component in the Avaya Aura stack, and only one entity pointing to the appropriate IP address is required.

Option A is wrong because it specifies the incorrect SIP Entity Type ("Presence Services" rather than "Engagement Development Platform"); using the wrong type means Session Manager won't route presence-related SIP traffic correctly. Options C and D are both wrong because they describe building two SIP Entities to the same SM100 IP address - this is unnecessary and incorrect; only a single SIP Entity is needed for Presence Services support, and duplicating entities to the same address creates configuration redundancy without functional benefit.

Memory tip: Think "EDP = Everything Presence" - one entity, one type (Engagement Development Platform). If you're tempted to build two entities or use a "Presence Services" type, remember: Avaya consolidated presence into EDP, so one EDP entity does the job.

No community discussion yet for this question.