712-50 · Question #155
Knowing the potential financial loss an organization is willing to suffer if a system fails is a determination of which of the following?
The correct answer is B. Risk appetite. Risk appetite (B) defines how much financial loss an organization is willing to accept if a system fails - it's the threshold of tolerable risk that guides security and business decisions. A (Cost benefit) is wrong because cost-benefit analysis compares the cost of a control…
Question
Knowing the potential financial loss an organization is willing to suffer if a system fails is a determination of which of the following?
Options
- ACost benefit
- BRisk appetite
- CBusiness continuity
- DLikelihood of impact
How the community answered
(35 responses)- A14% (5)
- B77% (27)
- C6% (2)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
Risk appetite (B) defines how much financial loss an organization is willing to accept if a system fails - it's the threshold of tolerable risk that guides security and business decisions.
- A (Cost benefit) is wrong because cost-benefit analysis compares the cost of a control against the loss it prevents - it's a calculation, not a tolerance threshold.
- C (Business continuity) is wrong because BC focuses on keeping operations running during/after a disruption, not on quantifying acceptable financial loss.
- D (Likelihood of impact) is wrong because that describes the probability or severity of a threat occurring, not the organization's willingness to absorb losses.
Memory tip: Think of "appetite" as hunger - it answers how much pain (loss) you're willing to stomach. If you see "willing to accept/tolerate/suffer" in a question, that's always risk appetite.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.