700-280 · Question #70
If the marketing message detection feature mislabels legitimate mail as marketing, which action corrects this error?
The correct answer is C. Send samples of mislabeled legitimate mail to [email protected]. Sending mislabeled legitimate mail to [email protected] trains Cisco IronPort's filtering engine by submitting confirmed false positives - "ham" is the industry term for legitimate (non-spam) email, so this address is specifically designed to receive misclassified good…
Question
If the marketing message detection feature mislabels legitimate mail as marketing, which action corrects this error?
Options
- ATurn off Marketing Message Detection.
- BWhitelistthe domains that send the mislabeled messages.
- CSend samples of mislabeled legitimate mail to [email protected].
- DSend samples of mislabeled legitimate mail to [email protected].
How the community answered
(22 responses)- B5% (1)
- C91% (20)
- D5% (1)
Explanation
Sending mislabeled legitimate mail to [email protected] trains Cisco IronPort's filtering engine by submitting confirmed false positives - "ham" is the industry term for legitimate (non-spam) email, so this address is specifically designed to receive misclassified good mail and improve detection accuracy.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A is too blunt - disabling the feature entirely sacrifices all marketing detection just to avoid occasional errors, rather than refining the system.
- B (whitelisting domains) bypasses detection for those senders permanently, which is a workaround, not a fix - it also creates a security gap if those domains are ever compromised.
- D (
[email protected]) is the wrong submission address - this endpoint is for reporting missed marketing/spam that was not caught (false negatives), the opposite problem.
Memory tip: Think "ham vs. spam" - ham@ = "this is ham (legitimate), not spam, please learn from it." If you got spam that slipped through, you'd report to the spam/adds address; if good mail got wrongly flagged, you send it to ham@.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.