In which two ways does Cisco Business Edition 6000 deployment mitigate and reduce the business risk? (Choose two)

Question

Options

• AThe end-to-end Cisco collaboration solution eliminates the risk of other vendor applications and devices not
• BCisco Jabber uses a consistent user interface on all devices. Changing devices does not impact user
• CCisco Collaboration Architecture supports all major operating systems and devices, minimizing the risk of a
• DCisco proprietary communications protocols mitigate the risk of interoperability with other vendor

• A
  8% (3)
• B
  86% (31)
• D
  6% (2)

Explanation

B is correct because Cisco Jabber delivers a consistent user interface across all devices (desktop, mobile, tablet), so employees who switch or lose a device can remain productive immediately - eliminating the retraining and downtime risk that device changes typically create. C is correct because BE6000's collaboration architecture supports all major operating systems and devices, meaning the business isn't locked into a narrow hardware/OS ecosystem; if one device type becomes unavailable, users can shift to alternatives without disruption.

A is wrong because it makes the false claim that using an all-Cisco stack eliminates risk from other vendors - BE6000 is actually designed to interoperate with third-party applications and devices, so this contradicts its real value proposition. D is wrong because BE6000 relies on open, standards-based protocols (such as SIP), not Cisco proprietary protocols; proprietary protocols would increase interoperability risk, not reduce it - the opposite of what the question asks.

Memory tip: Focus on the user experience (B = Jabber consistency = no retraining risk) and platform flexibility (C = broad OS/device support = no lock-in risk). Eliminate A because "eliminates" is an absolute claim that's too strong, and eliminate D because "proprietary" is always a red flag when the question is about reducing interoperability risk.

No community discussion yet for this question.