Which three features provided by NGFW and NGIPS support the 'Internet Edge" use case? (Choose three.)

Question

Options

• ASupports High Availability
• BSupport for profiling devices
• CSupports dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF or BGP
• DSupport for Platform exchange grid
• ESupport for High Bandwith environments
• FSupport for integrated posture assessment

• A
  86% (19)
• B
  5% (1)
• F
  9% (2)

Explanation

At the Internet Edge, the NGFW/NGIPS must handle real-world internet connectivity demands, which is why A, C, and E are correct: High Availability ensures no single point of failure where your network meets the internet; dynamic routing protocols (OSPF/BGP) are essential for peering with ISPs and advertising/receiving routes at the edge; and High Bandwidth support is required because internet edge devices must process large volumes of inbound and outbound traffic without becoming a bottleneck.

The distractors (B, D, F) belong to different use cases: device profiling (B) is a campus/internal network feature used for identifying endpoints on a LAN; Platform Exchange Grid/pxGrid (D) is a Cisco ISE integration feature for sharing security context across internal tools, not an edge routing concern; and integrated posture assessment (F) is tied to VPN/remote access or network admission control scenarios where endpoint compliance is checked before granting internal access.

Memory tip: Think "Internet Edge = I'm facing the outside world" - you need to stay up (HA), speak routing language with ISPs (BGP/OSPF), and handle the flood of traffic (High Bandwidth). Posture, profiling, and pxGrid are all about who's inside - the wrong direction for this use case.

No community discussion yet for this question.