Which three features provided by NGFW and NGIPS support the Internet Edge' use case? (Choose three.)

Question

Options

• ASupports High Availability
• BSupport (or profiling devices
• CSupports dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF or BGP
• DSupport for Platform exchange grid
• ESupport for High Bandwith environments
• FSupport for integrated posture assessment

• A
  81% (29)
• B
  11% (4)
• D
  3% (1)
• F
  6% (2)

Explanation

Internet Edge is the use case for securing traffic between an organization's internal network and the internet - a perimeter that demands continuous uptime, ISP routing integration, and the ability to handle high volumes of traffic. High Availability (A) is correct because internet edge devices are critical choke points where failover is non-negotiable. Dynamic routing protocols like OSPF/BGP (C) are correct because BGP in particular is the standard protocol for peering with ISPs at the internet boundary. High Bandwidth support (E) is correct because internet-facing NGFWs must inspect and forward large traffic volumes without becoming bottlenecks.

The distractors belong to different use cases: Device profiling (B) and integrated posture assessment (F) are NAC/campus access control features (think: "who is this endpoint and is it compliant?"), not edge security concerns. Platform Exchange Grid/pxGrid (D) is a Cisco ISE context-sharing framework used for internal policy enforcement, not internet edge traffic management.

Memory tip: Think "Internet Edge = Up, Fast, and Routed" - High Availability (stay Up), High Bandwidth (stay Fast), and BGP/OSPF (stay Routed to the ISP). The wrong answers all involve knowing who's on your internal network, which is a campus/data center problem, not an edge problem.

No community discussion yet for this question.