400-007 · Question #54
You were tasked to enhance the security of a network with these characteristics: - A pool of servers is accessed by numerous data centers and remote sites - The servers are accessed via a cluster of…
The correct answer is D. Deploy uRPF loose mode. uRPF loose mode validates source IP addresses against the routing table without requiring the packet to arrive on the best-return-path interface, making it compatible with asymmetric routing environments.
Question
You were tasked to enhance the security of a network with these characteristics:
- A pool of servers is accessed by numerous data centers and remote sites
- The servers are accessed via a cluster of firewalls
- The firewalls are configured properly and are not dropping traffic
- The firewalls occasionally cause asymmetric routing of traffic within the server data center.
Which technology should you recommend to enhance security by limiting traffic that could originate from a hacker compromising a workstation and redirecting flows at the servers?
Options
- APoison certain subnets by adding static routes to Null0 on the core switches connected to the
- BDeploy uRPF strict mode.
- CLimit sources of traffic that exit the server-facing interface of the firewall cluster with ACLs.
- DDeploy uRPF loose mode
How the community answered
(29 responses)- A17% (5)
- B10% (3)
- C3% (1)
- D69% (20)
Why each option
uRPF loose mode validates source IP addresses against the routing table without requiring the packet to arrive on the best-return-path interface, making it compatible with asymmetric routing environments.
Adding static routes to Null0 blackholes specific destination prefixes but does not dynamically filter spoofed source IP addresses originating from compromised workstations.
uRPF strict mode checks that a packet arrives on the same interface the router would use to forward traffic back to the source IP; in an asymmetric routing environment this would drop legitimate traffic, making it unsuitable here.
ACLs on the server-facing firewall interface are static constructs that require manual definition of permitted sources and do not scale to dynamically prevent spoofed traffic from arbitrary compromised hosts.
uRPF loose mode drops packets only if the source IP address has no entry in the routing table at all, effectively blocking spoofed or unroutable source addresses used by attackers. Unlike strict mode, it does not require the ingress interface to match the best-path reverse route, so legitimate asymmetric traffic caused by the firewall cluster is not dropped. This provides anti-spoofing security without disrupting the existing asymmetric traffic flows.
Concept tested: uRPF loose mode in asymmetric routing environments
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_data_urpf/configuration/xe-16/sec-data-urpf-xe-16-book/sec-cfg-unicast-rpf.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.