nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #541

You are designing a new multisite data center network within the same city. You are using the newest routers that run OSPF and DWDM point-to-point interfaces for site-to-site connectivity. Your primar

The correct answer is C. LoS/AIS event faults. On DWDM point-to-point links, physical layer optical fault signals provide the fastest possible interface failure detection, faster than any software-based timer mechanism.

Design Considerations

Question

You are designing a new multisite data center network within the same city. You are using the newest routers that run OSPF and DWDM point-to-point interfaces for site-to-site connectivity. Your primary objective is to use the fastest possible method for interface failure detection. Which method achieves this objective?

Options

  • AUDLD
  • BInterface event dampening
  • CLoS/AIS event faults
  • DFast-hello timers

How the community answered

(24 responses)
  • A
    8% (2)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    83% (20)
  • D
    4% (1)

Why each option

On DWDM point-to-point links, physical layer optical fault signals provide the fastest possible interface failure detection, faster than any software-based timer mechanism.

AUDLD

UDLD detects unidirectional fiber link conditions but operates at a higher software layer and is not the fastest mechanism compared to hardware-level optical LoS/AIS signals.

BInterface event dampening

Interface event dampening is a stability feature that suppresses repeated link-state flaps to protect the routing protocol, not a failure detection mechanism.

CLoS/AIS event faultsCorrect

Loss of Signal (LoS) and Alarm Indication Signal (AIS) are hardware-level optical fault notifications generated by the DWDM transceiver the instant the optical signal degrades or disappears. These events propagate at the physical layer without relying on any keepalive timer or protocol, so detection occurs in microseconds. This makes them faster than any software-driven mechanism such as sub-second BFD or fast-hello OSPF timers on DWDM interfaces.

DFast-hello timers

Fast-hello timers reduce the OSPF dead interval to sub-second values but still depend on software timer expiration, making them inherently slower than immediate hardware-level optical fault signaling on DWDM links.

Concept tested: DWDM optical layer fault detection mechanisms

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/interface/configuration/xe-3s/ir-xe-3s-book/ir-dwdm.html

Topics

#DWDM#LoS/AIS#interface failure detection#optical networking

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice