nerdexam
Exams352-001Questions#278
Cisco

352-001 · Question #278

352-001 Question #278: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

The correct answer is C: Replace VPLS with a Layer 3 MVPN solution to carry the streams between sites.. EoMPLS VPLS floods multicast like broadcast to all pseudowires, making it unscalable for high-bandwidth multicast across 100 sites; Layer 3 MVPN uses multicast distribution trees to deliver traffic only to interested receivers.

Question

An MPLS service provider is offering a standard EoMPLS-based VPLS service to Customer A, providing Layer 2 connectivity between a central site and approximately 100 remote sites. Customer A wants to use the VPLS network to carry its internal multicast video feeds, which are sourced at the central site and consist of 20 groups at 5 Mb/s each. Which service provider recommendation is the most scalable?

Options

  • AEoMPLS-based VPLS already carries multicast traffic in a scalable manner.
  • BReplicate the multicast traffic on the P routers.
  • CReplace VPLS with a Layer 3 MVPN solution to carry the streams between sites.
  • DUse GRE tunnels to carry the streams between sites.

Explanation

EoMPLS VPLS floods multicast like broadcast to all pseudowires, making it unscalable for high-bandwidth multicast across 100 sites; Layer 3 MVPN uses multicast distribution trees to deliver traffic only to interested receivers.

Common mistakes.

  • A. EoMPLS VPLS treats multicast as BUM traffic and floods it across all pseudowires to every site, consuming 100 Mb/s of replicated bandwidth per site and making the design extremely unscalable at 100 remote sites.
  • B. Replicating multicast on P routers does not eliminate the flooding behavior of VPLS; traffic would still be sent to all sites regardless of group membership, providing no scalability benefit.
  • D. GRE tunnels create point-to-point overlays that require the source to individually replicate each stream per tunnel, providing no multicast-awareness and no scalability improvement over standard VPLS flooding.

Concept tested. MVPN vs VPLS multicast scalability design

Reference. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipmulti_mvpn/configuration/xe-16/imc-mvpn-xe-16-book.html

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice