352-001 · Question #217
A certain service provider network includes IPsec tunnels between PE router loopbacks and dual- homed PE routers. The service provider is using OSPF to carry infrastructure routes and using BGP to…
The correct answer is A. tune OSPF on all routers. Because IPsec tunnels terminate on PE loopbacks that are reachable via OSPF infrastructure routes, tuning OSPF timers provides the fastest reconvergence after a link failure.
Question
A certain service provider network includes IPsec tunnels between PE router loopbacks and dual- homed PE routers. The service provider is using OSPF to carry infrastructure routes and using BGP to carry tunnel endpoints. What could the service provider do to provide fast convergence in case of a link failure in its network?
Options
- Atune OSPF on all routers
- Btune BGP on all routers
- Cconfigure a full mesh of traffic engineering among PE routers
- Dcarry IPsec tunnels in GRE among PE routers
- Ecarry IPsec tunnels in L2TPv3 among PE routers
- Fcarry IPsec tunnels in VPLS among PE routers
How the community answered
(59 responses)- A51% (30)
- B5% (3)
- C12% (7)
- D2% (1)
- E27% (16)
- F3% (2)
Why each option
Because IPsec tunnels terminate on PE loopbacks that are reachable via OSPF infrastructure routes, tuning OSPF timers provides the fastest reconvergence after a link failure.
OSPF carries all infrastructure routes including the PE loopback addresses that serve as IPsec tunnel endpoints, so OSPF convergence speed directly determines how quickly tunnels can be re-established after a failure. Tuning OSPF hello and dead intervals down and optimizing SPF calculation timers (incremental SPF, SPF throttling) allows link failures to be detected and alternate paths computed in sub-second time. Since BGP sessions run over these loopbacks, OSPF convergence is a prerequisite for BGP and IPsec recovery, making it the most impactful tuning target.
BGP carries tunnel endpoint addresses but depends on OSPF to provide reachability to those loopbacks first - tuning BGP timers alone does not help if the underlying OSPF reconvergence is slow after a link failure.
A full mesh of MPLS Traffic Engineering tunnels is a traffic engineering and capacity planning tool, not a mechanism for improving base routing convergence speed after a failure.
Encapsulating IPsec inside GRE adds an additional tunneling layer and changes the encapsulation format but does not affect how quickly OSPF or BGP detect and recover from a link failure.
L2TPv3 is a Layer 2 tunneling protocol used for pseudowire services and has no bearing on IP routing convergence speed or the recovery of IPsec tunnels after an infrastructure link failure.
VPLS is a Layer 2 multipoint VPN technology and is architecturally irrelevant to improving IP routing convergence for an IPsec-over-loopback design.
Concept tested: OSPF tuning for fast IGP convergence in MPLS networks
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/open-shortest-path-first-ospf/13689-17.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.