nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #137

A designer is working with a large bank to redesign their network. The designer wants to minimize complaints regarding slow application response times across the WAN. It is suspected that currently…

The correct answer is B. IPFIX. IPFIX exports per-flow records that include DSCP and ToS markings, making it the appropriate tool to validate whether QoS policies are classifying and marking traffic correctly across the WAN.

Designing Management and Operations

Question

A designer is working with a large bank to redesign their network. The designer wants to minimize complaints regarding slow application response times across the WAN. It is suspected that currently traffic is not being classified and marked correctly somewhere in the network. Which tool should the designer recommend to validate quality of service mappings and use?

Options

  • ASNMP
  • BIPFIX
  • CIP SLA
  • Dprotocol analyzer
  • ENBAR

How the community answered

(64 responses)
  • A
    5% (3)
  • B
    84% (54)
  • C
    2% (1)
  • D
    8% (5)
  • E
    2% (1)

Why each option

IPFIX exports per-flow records that include DSCP and ToS markings, making it the appropriate tool to validate whether QoS policies are classifying and marking traffic correctly across the WAN.

ASNMP

SNMP monitors device health and interface counters but does not provide per-flow QoS marking details needed to validate traffic classification policies.

BIPFIXCorrect

IPFIX (IP Flow Information Export) collects and exports per-flow statistics including DSCP markings and traffic class values, giving engineers visibility into how traffic is being classified at each point in the network. This flow-level telemetry allows direct validation of QoS mapping correctness without requiring full packet capture, and it scales across WAN links where a protocol analyzer would be impractical.

CIP SLA

IP SLA measures active performance metrics such as jitter, latency, and packet loss but does not inspect or report on DSCP values applied to production traffic flows.

Dprotocol analyzer

A protocol analyzer can show QoS markings on captured packets but lacks the flow aggregation and scalability required to validate QoS policy adherence across a distributed WAN.

ENBAR

NBAR is a traffic classification engine used to identify application types and apply QoS markings, but it is a marking tool rather than a reporting or validation tool for existing QoS mappings.

Concept tested: IPFIX for QoS marking validation

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/fnetflow/configuration/xe-3s/fnf-xe-3s-book/fnf-ipfix-export.html

Topics

#QoS validation#IPFIX#traffic classification#QoS marking

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice