350-801 · Question #259
Refer to the exhibit. A call from +1 613 555 1234 that is sent out through the Nice Gateways should result in a calling party of 001 613 555 1234 with the numbering type "international". Which configu
The correct answer is A. \+.l pre-dot 00 international. To transform a calling party number from E.164 format to a specific international format and set its numbering type, a translation pattern using \+.l for matching and pre-dot for prefixing, along with the correct numbering type, is required.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. A call from +1 613 555 1234 that is sent out through the Nice Gateways should result in a calling party of 001 613 555 1234 with the numbering type "international". Which configuration accomplishes this goal?
Exhibit
Options
- A+.l pre-dot 00 international
- B+ 0011 pre-dot 1 international
- C+1 ! none pre-dot 001 international
- D613XXXXXXX none +011 international
How the community answered
(60 responses)- A80% (48)
- B12% (7)
- C5% (3)
- D3% (2)
Why each option
To transform a calling party number from E.164 format to a specific international format and set its numbering type, a translation pattern using `\+.l` for matching and `pre-dot` for prefixing, along with the correct numbering type, is required.
The pattern `\+.l` is used to match an E.164 number starting with a plus sign, such as +1 613 555 1234. The `pre-dot 00` instruction then prepends '00' to the matched number, resulting in 001 613 555 1234, while setting the numbering type to 'international' correctly identifies the final format for outbound gateways.
`pre-dot 0011` would incorrectly prepend '0011', resulting in '00111 613 555 1234' instead of the desired '001 613 555 1234'.
`pre-dot 001` would result in '0011 613 555 1234', which is not the desired output '001 613 555 1234', and the `!` also has specific pattern matching implications.
The pattern `613XXXXXXX` would not match the E.164 calling party number `+1 613 555 1234` which starts with a plus sign, and `+011` as a pre-dot would also produce an incorrect result.
Concept tested: Cisco UCM Calling Party Number Transformation
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_storage/cucm/admin/12_5_1/systemConfig/cucm_b_system-configuration-guide-1251/cucm_b_system-configuration-guide-1251_chapter_0100.html#CUCM_RF_C466099D_00
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
