350-801 · Question #241
An administrator must implement toll fraud prevention on cisco UCM using these parameters: - Enable Forced Authorization Code 112211. - Set an authorization level of 3 for the route pattern…
The correct answer is C. Pattern = 8005xxxxxx. The requirements are: FAC code 112211, authorization level 3 on route pattern 8005551212, and no access code for standard 10-digit calls. Answer C - Pattern=8005xxxxxx - is correct because it uses wildcards to match 10-digit numbers beginning with 8005 (which includes…
Question
An administrator must implement toll fraud prevention on cisco UCM using these parameters:
- Enable Forced Authorization Code 112211.
- Set an authorization level of 3 for the route pattern 8005551212.
- Require no access code to dial 10-digit numbers.
How must the route pattern be implemented?
Options
- APattern = 3.800xxxxxx
- BPattern = 8005551212.1122113
- CPattern = 8005xxxxxx
- DPattern = 1122113.8005551212
How the community answered
(41 responses)- A17% (7)
- B7% (3)
- C73% (30)
- D2% (1)
Explanation
The requirements are: FAC code 112211, authorization level 3 on route pattern 8005551212, and no access code for standard 10-digit calls. Answer C - Pattern=8005xxxxxx - is correct because it uses wildcards to match 10-digit numbers beginning with 8005 (which includes 8005551212 and similar toll-free or long-distance numbers). The FAC authorization level (3) is set as a property on this route pattern in UCM, not encoded in the pattern string itself. The digit 'x' is the UCM wildcard for any single digit. Option A (3.800xxxxxx) incorrectly embeds the authorization level into the pattern syntax. Option B (8005551212.1122113) confuses the FAC code with the dial string. Option D reverses the code and number, which is not valid UCM pattern syntax.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.