350-601 · Question #386
350-601 Question #386: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
The correct answer is A: A contract exists between EPG-A and EPG-B and allows the traffic.. When two endpoints in different Endpoint Groups (EPGs) within Cisco ACI fail to communicate, it is crucial to verify the existence of a contract allowing traffic between those EPGs and confirm that both endpoints are correctly learned within their respective EPGs.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. SVR-A in EPG-A/BD-A fails to reach SVR-B in EPG-B/BD-B. Which two conditions should be verified to analyze the traffic between the two EPGs? (Choose two.)
Options
- AA contract exists between EPG-A and EPG-B and allows the traffic.
- BLimit Endpoint Learning is disabled on the bridge domain for EPG-B.
- CSVR-B is learned as an endpoint in EPG-B from Node-112.
- DEPG-A and EPG-B are excluded from the preferred group.
- EThe bridge domain for EPG-B floods ARP packets.
Explanation
When two endpoints in different Endpoint Groups (EPGs) within Cisco ACI fail to communicate, it is crucial to verify the existence of a contract allowing traffic between those EPGs and confirm that both endpoints are correctly learned within their respective EPGs.
Common mistakes.
- B. Limit Endpoint Learning (also known as Unicast Routing) controls whether the Bridge Domain performs IP learning; disabling it would not directly prevent traffic, and it's generally enabled for IP routing.
- D. Whether EPG-A and EPG-B are excluded from a preferred group primarily affects contract enforcement within a VRF, not necessarily the fundamental ability of a contract to allow traffic.
- E. While ARP flooding is necessary for endpoints to learn each other's MAC addresses within the same broadcast domain, this is an underlying mechanism; the primary issues for inter-EPG communication failure are typically contracts and endpoint learning.
Concept tested. Cisco ACI inter-EPG communication troubleshooting
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.