Refer to the exhibit. Assume all other configurations are correct and the network is otherwise operating normally. Which conclusion can you draw about the neighbor relationship between routers R1 and R2?

Question

Accepted Answer

B. The neighbor relationship is down because R1 believes R2 is in AS 65012. The "neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 65012" command on R1 indicates that R1 expects peer 192.168.1.2 (R2) to be in AS 65012. The exhibit for R2 shows "local-as 65112", meaning R2 identifies itself as AS 65112 to external peers, causing an AS mismatch and preventing the BGP session from establishing.

Answer

A. The neighbor relationship will be up only if the two devices have activated the correct neighbor The exhibit provides specific information about an AS mismatch, which is a definite reason for the neighbor relationship to be down, making this a general and less specific statement.

Answer

C. The neighbor relationship is up The neighbor relationship is down due to an AS mismatch between R1's expectation and R2's actual AS configuration.

Answer

D. The neighbor relationship is down because the loco I-as value for R2 is missing in the R1 The term "loco I-as" is not standard, and the exhibit clearly shows the "local-as" configured on R2, which is present and correctly configured on R2 but mismatches R1's remote AS configuration.

Refer to the exhibit. Assume all other configurations are correct and the network is otherwise operating normally. Which conclusion can you draw about the neighbor relationship between routers R1 and

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion