Refer to the exhibit. Which three outcomes occur if the prefix list is added to the neighbor? (Choose three)

The prefix 192.168.0.0/19 explicitly matches and is permitted by `seq 10 permit 192.168.0.0/19`.

The prefix 192.168.0.0/17 explicitly matches and is permitted by `seq 5 permit 192.168.0.0/16 ge 17 le 17`.

The prefix-list entry `seq 5 permit 192.168.0.0/16 ge 17 le 17` specifically permits any prefix that falls within the 192.168.0.0/16 range and has an exact prefix length of /17. Thus, 192.168.0.0/17 is permitted by this rule.

The prefix 192.168.0.0/16 does not match `seq 5` (its prefix length is 16, not 17) and does not match `seq 10` (its prefix length is 16, not 19). Therefore, it falls through to `seq 15 deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32`, which explicitly denies it.

The prefix 192.168.0.0/16 does not match any permit statements and is ultimately denied by the explicit deny all rule in `seq 15`.

The prefix-list entry `seq 10 permit 192.168.0.0/19` explicitly permits the specific prefix 192.168.0.0/19 as it matches the exact network and prefix length.