nerdexam
Cisco

350-501 · Question #433

Which fact must a network engineer consider when planning to deploy RSVP-TE FRR?

The correct answer is D. PLR prefers FRR NNHOP backup tunnels over NHOP tunnels. When deploying RSVP-TE FRR, a key consideration is that the Point of Local Repair (PLR) prioritizes Next-Next-Hop (NNHOP) backup tunnels over Next-Hop (NHOP) tunnels due to the broader protection NNHOP offers.

MPLS and Segment Routing

Question

Which fact must a network engineer consider when planning to deploy RSVP-TE FRR?

Options

  • APLR prefers FRR NHOP backup tunnels over NNHOP tunnels
  • BFRR protects MPLS LDP and RSVP-TE LSPs
  • CThe FRR backup tunnel reserves the total bandwidth of all protected tunnels
  • DPLR prefers FRR NNHOP backup tunnels over NHOP tunnels

How the community answered

(31 responses)
  • A
    6% (2)
  • B
    3% (1)
  • C
    3% (1)
  • D
    87% (27)

Why each option

When deploying RSVP-TE FRR, a key consideration is that the Point of Local Repair (PLR) prioritizes Next-Next-Hop (NNHOP) backup tunnels over Next-Hop (NHOP) tunnels due to the broader protection NNHOP offers.

APLR prefers FRR NHOP backup tunnels over NNHOP tunnels

This is the opposite of the correct behavior; NNHOP offers more comprehensive protection against both link and node failures.

BFRR protects MPLS LDP and RSVP-TE LSPs

RSVP-TE Fast Reroute is a feature specifically designed for RSVP-TE Label Switched Paths and does not provide FRR protection for MPLS LDP LSPs, which rely on IGP convergence for rerouting.

CThe FRR backup tunnel reserves the total bandwidth of all protected tunnels

FRR backup tunnels reserve bandwidth sufficient to carry the traffic of the specific primary tunnel they are designed to protect, not the aggregate bandwidth of all potentially protected tunnels simultaneously.

DPLR prefers FRR NNHOP backup tunnels over NHOP tunnelsCorrect

A PLR (Point of Local Repair) prefers NNHOP (Next-Next-Hop) backup tunnels over NHOP (Next-Hop) tunnels because NNHOP protection provides node protection, which covers both link and node failures, offering a more robust level of fault tolerance compared to link-only NHOP protection.

Concept tested: RSVP-TE Fast Reroute (FRR) protection

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_frr_te_cg_ps6441_tsd_item_root.html

Topics

#RSVP-TE#MPLS TE FRR#Node Protection#Link Protection

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-501 Practice