nerdexam
Cisco

350-401 · Question #737

Refer to the exhibit. Which command set must be added to permit and log all traffic that comes from 172.20.10.1 in interface GigabitEthernet0/1 without impacting the functionality of the access list?

The correct answer is A. Router(config)#access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.10.1 any log Router(config-if)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Router(config-if)#access-group 100 in. Option A correctly appends a single permit + log statement to the existing numbered ACL 100 and re-applies it to the interface. Because Cisco IOS appends new entries to numbered ACLs without disturbing existing ones, the existing rules remain intact and functional. Why the distra

Submitted by eva_at· Mar 6, 2026Security

Question

Refer to the exhibit. Which command set must be added to permit and log all traffic that comes from 172.20.10.1 in interface GigabitEthernet0/1 without impacting the functionality of the access list? A. B. C. D.

Exhibits

350-401 question #737 exhibit 1
350-401 question #737 exhibit 2

Options

  • ARouter(config)#access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.10.1 any log Router(config-if)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Router(config-if)#access-group 100 in
  • BRouter(config)#access-list 100 seq 5 permit ip host 172.20.10.1 any log Router(config)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Router(config-if)#access-group 100 in
  • CRouter(config)#ip access-list extended 100 Router(config-ext-nacl)#5 permit ip 172.20.10.0 0.0.0.255 any log Router(config)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Router(config-if)#access-group 100 in
  • DRouter(config)#no access-list 100 permit ip 172.16.0.0 0.0.15.255 any Router(config)#access-list 100 permit ip 172.16.0.0 0.0.15.255 any log Router(config)#interface GigabitEthernet0/1 Router(config-if)#access-group 100 in

How the community answered

(42 responses)
  • A
    71% (30)
  • B
    5% (2)
  • C
    17% (7)
  • D
    7% (3)

Explanation

Option A correctly appends a single permit + log statement to the existing numbered ACL 100 and re-applies it to the interface. Because Cisco IOS appends new entries to numbered ACLs without disturbing existing ones, the existing rules remain intact and functional.

Why the distractors fail:

  • B uses the seq keyword (access-list 100 seq 5 ...), which is invalid syntax for numbered ACLs - sequence-based insertion only works with named ACLs (ip access-list extended).
  • C uses the wildcard 0.0.0.255, which matches the entire 172.20.10.0/24 subnet rather than the specific host 172.20.10.1, so it over-permits beyond what the question requires.
  • D is the most dangerous: no access-list 100 permit ip ... on a numbered ACL deletes the entire ACL, not just that one line - this completely breaks existing functionality before re-adding a partial rule.

Memory tip: Think of numbered ACLs as a one-way tape - you can only append to the end or delete the whole thing. If you need to insert, delete a single line, or reorder entries, you must convert to a named ACL (ip access-list extended). This distinction is a frequent exam trap.

Topics

#Access Control Lists (ACLs)#Cisco IOS Commands#Network Security#Traffic Filtering

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-401 Practice