Refer to the exhibit. After configuring the BGP network an engineer verifies that the path between Server1 and Server2 is functional. Why did RouterSF choose the route from RouterDAL instead of the ro

After comparing all other BGP path attributes (such as Weight, Local Preference, AIGP, AS-Path length, Origin, and MED), if a tie still exists, BGP will prefer the path advertised by the BGP router with the numerically lowest BGP Router ID.

While a lower MED is preferred, MED is typically compared earlier in the BGP path selection process, usually for routes originating from the same AS, and if it were the sole decider, it would have been chosen before resorting to the Router ID tie-breaker.

If BGP was not running on RouterCHI, RouterSF would not have received any routes from it to compare against RouterDAL's routes.

A static route with a default administrative distance (1) is usually preferred over a BGP route (AD 20 for eBGP, 200 for iBGP); if a static route for 10.0.0.0/24 existed on RouterSF, it would be used without comparing BGP paths.