350-050 · Question #126
Refer to the exhibit. You are testing coverage-hole detection in your lab. You are using the default Cisco WLC coverage-hole detection configuration that is shown. You have 14 test clients, all…
The correct answer is A. The failed clients must be at an RSSI of -81 dBm or lower for at least 90 seconds. C. The number of failed clients is less than 25 percent of the total number of clients that are associated. See the full explanation below for the reasoning.
Question
Refer to the exhibit. You are testing coverage-hole detection in your lab. You are using the default Cisco WLC coverage-hole detection configuration that is shown. You have 14 test clients, all associated to the same AP. You move three of the clients far away from the AP so that they have an RSSI of -85 dBm or lower for 1 minute. To your surprise, you see precoverage-hole alarms, but no coverage- hole alarm is triggered. Which two scenarios explain this issue? (Choose two.)
Exhibit
Options
- AThe failed clients must be at an RSSI of -81 dBm or lower for at least 90 seconds.
- BThe failed clients must be at an RSSI of -80 dBm or lower for at least 90 seconds.
- CThe number of failed clients is less than 25 percent of the total number of clients that are associated
- DThis Cisco WLC is not an RF group leader and so cannot make a coverage-hole decision.
- ECoverage-hole alarms are generated based on the number and percentage of failed packets from the
How the community answered
(32 responses)- A75% (24)
- B13% (4)
- D3% (1)
- E9% (3)
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.