Jude, a pen tester working in Keiltech Ltd., performs sophisticated security testing on his company's network infrastructure to identify security loopholes. In this process, he started to circumvent…

Question

Options

• AUDP flood attack
• BPing-of-death attack
• CSpoofed session flood attack
• DPeer-to-peer attack

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  9% (3)
• C
  86% (30)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Spoofed Session Flood Attack Explained

Why C is Correct: A Spoofed Session Flood Attack works by forging legitimate-looking TCP sessions using manipulated SYN, ACK, and RST/FIN packets - the exact handshake components of the TCP three-way handshake - to trick firewalls and network protection tools into believing the traffic is legitimate, while simultaneously exhausting network resources through DDoS-style flooding.

Why the Distractors are Wrong:

• A (UDP Flood): Uses UDP packets specifically to overwhelm a target, with no TCP session manipulation or forging involved.
• B (Ping-of-Death): Involves sending malformed or oversized ICMP ping packets to crash systems - entirely unrelated to TCP session forgery.
• D (Peer-to-Peer Attack): Exploits P2P network protocols to redirect traffic toward a victim, not through crafted TCP handshake packets.

Memory Tip: Think of the word "Spoofed Session" - if you see any exam question mentioning forged TCP sessions combined with SYN/ACK/RST/FIN packets and firewall circumvention, that's your direct signal pointing to a Spoofed Session Flood Attack. The key phrase is "forged TCP sessions."

No community discussion yet for this question.