312-50V10 · Question #863
Johnson, an attacker, performed online research for the contact details of reputed cybersecurity firms. He found the contact number of sibertech.org and dialed the number, claiming himself to…
The correct answer is B. Diversion theft. Johnson used phone-based social engineering to impersonate a vendor support representative and trick the victim into installing malware that diverted sensitive data to his system, matching the diversion theft technique.
Question
Johnson, an attacker, performed online research for the contact details of reputed cybersecurity firms. He found the contact number of sibertech.org and dialed the number, claiming himself to represent a technical support team from a vendor. He warned that a specific server is about to be compromised and requested sibertech.org to follow the provided instructions. Consequently, he prompted the victim to execute unusual commands and install malicious files, which were then used to collect and pass critical Information to Johnson's machine. What is the social engineering technique Steve employed in the above scenario?
Options
- AQuid pro quo
- BDiversion theft
- CElicitatiom
- DPhishing
How the community answered
(49 responses)- A4% (2)
- B84% (41)
- C10% (5)
- D2% (1)
Why each option
Johnson used phone-based social engineering to impersonate a vendor support representative and trick the victim into installing malware that diverted sensitive data to his system, matching the diversion theft technique.
Quid pro quo involves an attacker offering a direct service or benefit in exchange for credentials or access, framed as mutual assistance - the scenario focuses on deceptive redirection of data rather than a reciprocal exchange.
Diversion theft is a social engineering technique in which an attacker manipulates a target into redirecting valuable assets - including sensitive data - to an unintended destination controlled by the attacker. Johnson impersonated a trusted vendor, used a fabricated server compromise warning to create urgency, and directed the victim to install malicious software that collected and forwarded critical information to his own machine, making data diversion the central outcome of the attack.
Elicitation is the extraction of information through seemingly casual or benign conversation without the target realizing they are disclosing sensitive details - this scenario involves active manipulation, malware installation, and data exfiltration, not passive information gathering.
Phishing delivers deceptive content through email or fake websites to harvest credentials or deploy malware - the attack in this scenario was conducted entirely over a phone call, making it a voice-based social engineering method, not phishing.
Concept tested: Diversion theft social engineering via phone impersonation
Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/social_engineering
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.