nerdexam
EC-Council

312-49 · Question #425

If you see the files Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system while doing an investigation, what can you conclude?

The correct answer is D. Nothing in particular as these can be operational files. Observing files named Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system provides no inherent conclusion about system compromise or specific operational activity without further context, as these are generic names.

Submitted by khalil_dz· Apr 18, 2026Disk Forensics

Question

If you see the files Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system while doing an investigation, what can you conclude?

Options

  • AThe system files have been copied by a remote attacker
  • BThe system administrator has created an incremental backup
  • CThe system has been compromised using a t0rn rootkit
  • DNothing in particular as these can be operational files

How the community answered

(36 responses)
  • A
    11% (4)
  • B
    3% (1)
  • C
    6% (2)
  • D
    81% (29)

Why each option

Observing files named `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` on a Linux system provides no inherent conclusion about system compromise or specific operational activity without further context, as these are generic names.

AThe system files have been copied by a remote attacker

While an attacker *could* create such files, these names are not inherently indicative of a remote attacker versus a local user or automated process without further evidence.

BThe system administrator has created an incremental backup

These names do not specifically suggest an 'incremental backup'; they are too generic to infer a particular backup strategy without more information.

CThe system has been compromised using a t0rn rootkit

The filenames `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` are not specifically associated with the `t0rn` rootkit or any other particular malware without additional evidence.

DNothing in particular as these can be operational filesCorrect

File names like `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` are generic and could be created by legitimate system operations, users, or benign scripts. Without additional evidence such as file contents, timestamps, owner, permissions, or system logs, it is impossible to conclude that they indicate malicious activity or a specific type of backup.

Concept tested: Linux file system forensics, initial assessment

Topics

#File analysis#Linux forensics#Rootkit indicators#Forensic methodology

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 312-49 Practice