312-49 · Question #425
If you see the files Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system while doing an investigation, what can you conclude?
The correct answer is D. Nothing in particular as these can be operational files. Observing files named Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system provides no inherent conclusion about system compromise or specific operational activity without further context, as these are generic names.
Question
If you see the files Zer0.tar.gz and copy.tar.gz on a Linux system while doing an investigation, what can you conclude?
Options
- AThe system files have been copied by a remote attacker
- BThe system administrator has created an incremental backup
- CThe system has been compromised using a t0rn rootkit
- DNothing in particular as these can be operational files
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A11% (4)
- B3% (1)
- C6% (2)
- D81% (29)
Why each option
Observing files named `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` on a Linux system provides no inherent conclusion about system compromise or specific operational activity without further context, as these are generic names.
While an attacker *could* create such files, these names are not inherently indicative of a remote attacker versus a local user or automated process without further evidence.
These names do not specifically suggest an 'incremental backup'; they are too generic to infer a particular backup strategy without more information.
The filenames `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` are not specifically associated with the `t0rn` rootkit or any other particular malware without additional evidence.
File names like `Zer0.tar.gz` and `copy.tar.gz` are generic and could be created by legitimate system operations, users, or benign scripts. Without additional evidence such as file contents, timestamps, owner, permissions, or system logs, it is impossible to conclude that they indicate malicious activity or a specific type of backup.
Concept tested: Linux file system forensics, initial assessment
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.