Refer to the exhibit. The exhibit shows the XML schema to associate a device with the AddUser operation in AXL. Which XML snippet is correct to associate a device with name "SEP1515151515"?

Question

Exhibit

Options

• A<associatedDevices> <device name="SEP1515151515"> </associatedDevices>
• B<routePartitionName> <device>SEP1515151515</device> </routePartitionName>
• C<routePartitionName> <device name="SEP1515151515"> </routePartitionName>
• D<associatedDevices> <device>SEP1515151515</device> </associatedDevices>

• B
  3% (1)
• C
  3% (1)
• D
  95% (35)

Explanation

Option D correctly uses <associatedDevices> as the parent element and passes the device name as text content inside <device>SEP1515151515</device>, which matches the AXL schema definition for the AddUser operation. Option A is wrong because it incorrectly uses a name="" XML attribute on the <device> element - the AXL schema expects the device name as element text, not an attribute. Options B and C are both wrong because <routePartitionName> is an entirely unrelated element used for partition assignments, not device associations. Option C compounds the error by also using the incorrect name="" attribute syntax.

Memory tip: Think "devices go in associatedDevices, and AXL uses text nodes - not attributes - for simple values." If you see a device MAC like SEP... wrapped in a tag with no =, that's AXL's style.

No community discussion yet for this question.