300-810 · Question #186
An engineer Is assisting a user who Is reporting Jabber Presence Issues. Whenever the user Is on an active call, Cisco Jabber does not show the user as active when on a call. However, the user can…
The correct answer is B. Restart the SCP Router service. When a Cisco Jabber user's presence does not automatically reflect an active call state (on-phone) but manual presence changes work correctly, the issue lies in how presence state changes from the call control layer are propagated to the IM and Presence service. The SCP…
Question
An engineer Is assisting a user who Is reporting Jabber Presence Issues. Whenever the user Is on an active call, Cisco Jabber does not show the user as active when on a call. However, the user can set the presence status manually, and that status shows correctly. Which action resolves the issue?
Options
- AAssign the user to a different Presence Redundancy Group.
- BRestart the SCP Router service.
- CSet the Owner ID on the users desk phone.
- DAssociate the user to the line on the Directory Number Configuration page.
How the community answered
(52 responses)- A2% (1)
- B79% (41)
- C6% (3)
- D13% (7)
Explanation
When a Cisco Jabber user's presence does not automatically reflect an active call state (on-phone) but manual presence changes work correctly, the issue lies in how presence state changes from the call control layer are propagated to the IM and Presence service. The SCP (Sub-Cluster Protocol) Router service on Cisco IM and Presence is responsible for routing presence subscription and notification messages between nodes and subsystems. If this service has a fault, call-state-driven presence updates (which travel through a different path than manual status changes) will fail while manual updates still succeed. Restarting the SCP Router service clears this condition. Options C and D relate to phone ownership and line association, which affect CTI-based presence but would typically prevent all presence, not just call-state presence.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.