300-730 · Question #79
A network engineer must implement an SSLVPN Cisco AnyConnect solution that supports 500 concurrent users, ensures all traffic from the client passes through the ASA, and allows users to access all…
The correct answer is A. group-policy DfltGrpPolicy internal group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes split-tunnel-policy tunnelall address-pools value ACPool ip local pool ACPool 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 mask 255.255.252.0. Full-tunnel AnyConnect for 500 users requires 'tunnelall' to route all traffic through the ASA and an address pool large enough to support 500 concurrent leases.
Question
Options
- Agroup-policy DfltGrpPolicy internal group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes split-tunnel-policy tunnelall address-pools value ACPool ip local pool ACPool 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 mask 255.255.252.0
- Baccess-list ACsplit standard permit 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 group-policy DfltGrpPolicy internal group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified split-tunnel-network-list value ACsplit address-pools value ACPool ip local pool ACPool 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 mask 255.255.252.0
- Caccess-list ACsplit standard permit 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 group-policy DfltGrpPolicy internal group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified split-tunnel-network-list value ACsplit address-pools value ACPool
- Dgroup-policy DfltGrpPolicy internal group-policy DfltGrpPolicy attributes split-tunnel-policy tunnelall address-pools value ACPool ip local pool ACPool 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 mask 255.255.255.0
How the community answered
(16 responses)- A56% (9)
- B25% (4)
- C13% (2)
- D6% (1)
Why each option
Full-tunnel AnyConnect for 500 users requires 'tunnelall' to route all traffic through the ASA and an address pool large enough to support 500 concurrent leases.
The 'split-tunnel-policy tunnelall' directive ensures all client traffic is forced through the ASA, satisfying the full-tunnel requirement. The pool 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.254 with mask 255.255.252.0 is a /22 network providing 1022 usable addresses, which comfortably supports 500 concurrent users. Answer D uses the same tunnelall policy but has a /24 mask (255.255.255.0) yielding only 254 addresses, which is insufficient for 500 users.
'split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified' sends only the listed ACL traffic through the tunnel, meaning general Internet traffic bypasses the ASA and violates the 'all traffic through ASA' requirement.
Same split-tunnel problem as B, and additionally the 'ip local pool' definition is missing, so the ASA has no pool to assign addresses from.
While 'tunnelall' is correct, the pool mask 255.255.255.0 creates only a /24 pool with 254 addresses, which cannot support 500 concurrent users.
Concept tested: AnyConnect full-tunnel policy and address pool sizing
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa96/configuration/vpn/asa-96-vpn-config/vpn-remote-access.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.