nerdexam
Cisco

300-615 · Question #271

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer implemented this fcdomain configuration on the MSD_1 and MDS_2 devices. However, after the engineer applies the configuration, this error is received. Which action re

The correct answer is B. Change the domain of MDS_1 to 20.. The error message indicates a domain ID conflict. Both MDS_1 and MDS_2 are configured with the same domain ID (10) for VSAN 10, which is causing the conflict. In a Fibre Channel fabric, each switch must have a unique domain ID. To resolve the conflict, you should change the domai

Storage Network

Question

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer implemented this fcdomain configuration on the MSD_1 and MDS_2 devices. However, after the engineer applies the configuration, this error is received. Which action resolves the issue?

Exhibits

300-615 question #271 exhibit 1
300-615 question #271 exhibit 2
300-615 question #271 exhibit 3
300-615 question #271 exhibit 4

Options

  • AIncrease the priority of MDS_1 to 20.
  • BChange the domain of MDS_1 to 20.
  • CMove MDS_2 to static VSAN 20.
  • DRestart fcdomain vsan 20 on MDS 2.

How the community answered

(27 responses)
  • A
    4% (1)
  • B
    81% (22)
  • C
    11% (3)
  • D
    4% (1)

Explanation

The error message indicates a domain ID conflict. Both MDS_1 and MDS_2 are configured with the same domain ID (10) for VSAN 10, which is causing the conflict. In a Fibre Channel fabric, each switch must have a unique domain ID. To resolve the conflict, you should change the domain ID of MDS_1 to 20. This will ensure that both switches have unique domain IDs and will eliminate the conflict.

Topics

#fcdomain#MDS#VSAN#FC domain ID

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-615 Practice