300-610 · Question #331
A network administrator must optimize and simplify the VF architecture on an ACI fabric. The current deployment includes multiple tenants, each with its own network stack, and inter-tenant connectivit
The correct answer is B. Collapse all VRFs into a single VRF in the common tenant.. Collapsing all VRFs into a single VRF in the common tenant eliminates the need for VRF-leaking, which significantly reduces the number of route prefixes programmed into the switches. This simplifies the architecture and resolves the prefix capacity issue while still allowing shar
Question
A network administrator must optimize and simplify the VF architecture on an ACI fabric. The current deployment includes multiple tenants, each with its own network stack, and inter-tenant connectivity is managed through VRF-leaking. However, the large number of tenants is causing the switches to reach their prefix capacity limits due to VRF-leaking. What solution should an engineer recommend to simplify this architecture and resolve the capacity issue?
Options
- ACollapse all VRFs into multiple VRFs in the common tenant and use VRF-leaking.
- BCollapse all VRFs into a single VRF in the common tenant.
- CCollapse all VRFs into multiple VRFs in the management tenant and use VRF-leaking.
- DCollapse all VRFs into a single VRF in the management tenant.
How the community answered
(67 responses)- A4% (3)
- B60% (40)
- C10% (7)
- D25% (17)
Explanation
Collapsing all VRFs into a single VRF in the common tenant eliminates the need for VRF-leaking, which significantly reduces the number of route prefixes programmed into the switches. This simplifies the architecture and resolves the prefix capacity issue while still allowing shared connectivity across formerly separate tenant networks.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.