nerdexam
Cisco

300-420 · Question #317

An architect is designing a connectivity solution for a customer's two small branch offices. The customer wants a cost-effective design, no routing overhead, and some down time during the year is…

The correct answer is A. single-homed. For two small branch offices seeking a cost-effective design with minimal routing overhead and acceptable downtime, a single-homed connectivity solution is the most suitable choice.

WAN for Enterprise Networks

Question

An architect is designing a connectivity solution for a customer's two small branch offices. The customer wants a cost-effective design, no routing overhead, and some down time during the year is acceptable. Which connectivity solution must the architect choose?

Options

  • Asingle-homed
  • Bdual multihomed
  • Csingle multihomed
  • Ddual-homed

How the community answered

(33 responses)
  • A
    76% (25)
  • B
    9% (3)
  • C
    12% (4)
  • D
    3% (1)

Why each option

For two small branch offices seeking a cost-effective design with minimal routing overhead and acceptable downtime, a single-homed connectivity solution is the most suitable choice.

Asingle-homedCorrect

A single-homed design, involving a single connection to a service provider, is the most cost-effective option, introduces the least routing overhead, and inherently implies that some downtime is tolerable, fulfilling all customer requirements.

Bdual multihomed

Dual multihomed designs involve multiple connections to multiple service providers, offering high redundancy and increased complexity, which is neither cost-effective nor low on routing overhead.

Csingle multihomed

Single multihomed refers to multiple connections to a single service provider, which offers some redundancy but increases cost and complexity compared to a single-homed setup, not aligning with the 'most cost-effective' requirement.

Ddual-homed

Dual-homed solutions typically involve two connections to one service provider or device, providing more redundancy but also incurring higher costs and more routing considerations than a single-homed design.

Concept tested: Branch office connectivity design types

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/qos/QoS_SRND_40/QoSWAN.html

Topics

#WAN connectivity#Branch office design#Network design principles#Redundancy levels

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-420 Practice