Refer to the exhibit. Site 2 prefers the MPLS circuit to reach site 1 and advertises the routes learned into service VPN. Which policy configuration achieves this?

Question

Accepted Answer

A. Router Centralized Policy > Topology > Sequence Rule Match Conditions Color List: MPLS Actions Accept Preference: 500 To make Site 2 prefer the MPLS circuit for reaching Site 1, a centralized route policy is used. The policy would match routes originating from or destined for Site 1 (or its TLOCs) with the 'MPLS' color. Setting a higher 'Preference' (e.g., 500) for these routes on Site 2 effectively makes the MPLS path more desirable than other paths.

Answer

B. TLOC Centralized Policy > Topology > Sequence Rule Match Conditions Originator: 10.10.1.1 Actions Accept Preference: 500 Matching on 'Originator' IP address alone is not specific enough to prioritize a particular color (MPLS) for reaching Site 1 from Site 2; a TLOC policy or a route policy matching TLOC color is more appropriate for path selection.

Answer

C. TLOC Centralized Policy > Topology > Sequence Rule Match Conditions TLOC IP: 10.10.1.1 Color: mpls Encapsulation: IPSEC Actions Accept Preference: 500 While a TLOC Centralized Policy can influence TLOC properties, the objective of preferring a specific circuit for routes is better achieved by a route policy that modifies vRoute attributes like TLOC preference.

Answer

D. Route Centralized Policy > Topology > Sequence Rule Match Conditions Site List: Actions Accept Site ID: 101 TLOC IP: 10.10.1.1 Color: mpls Encapsulation: IPSEC The syntax 'Actions Accept Site ID: 101' is incorrect for a route policy action; Site ID is typically a match condition, and preference is set directly as an action.

Refer to the exhibit. Site 2 prefers the MPLS circuit to reach site 1 and advertises the routes learned into service VPN. Which policy configuration achieves this?

Question

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion