300-410 · Question #47
Refer to the exhibit. Why is user authentication being rejected?
The correct answer is D. The TACACS+ server is down and the user is not in the local database. User authentication is being rejected because the TACACS+ server is unreachable, and the router cannot find the user's credentials in its local fallback database.
Question
Options
- AThe TACACS+ server expects "user" but the NT client sends "domain\user"
- BThe TACACS+ server refuses the user because the user is set up for CHAP
- CThe TACACS+ server is down and the user is in the local database
- DThe TACACS+ server is down and the user is not in the local database
How the community answered
(17 responses)- B6% (1)
- D94% (16)
Why each option
User authentication is being rejected because the TACACS+ server is unreachable, and the router cannot find the user's credentials in its local fallback database.
While username format mismatches can cause authentication issues, the primary reason for rejection when the TACACS+ server is down is its unavailability and the lack of a successful fallback.
TACACS+ servers support various authentication methods, including CHAP, so a user configured for CHAP would not be inherently refused unless there's a misconfiguration in the server or client, or the server is unreachable.
If the TACACS+ server is down but the user is present in the local database, local authentication should succeed, not be rejected.
If the primary TACACS+ server is down, the authentication process typically attempts to fall back to the router's local database. When the user's credentials are not present in this local database, or if local authentication is not configured as a fallback, the authentication request will be rejected.
Concept tested: TACACS+ fallback authentication
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_usr_radtac/configuration/xe-3s/sec-rad-tac-xe-3s-book/sec-rad-tac-fallback.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.