300-370 · Question #85
When use fingerprinting method, which is the least cost , easiest lateration to use? the options were :TDOA , cell of origin , VOR , )
The correct answer is A. cell of origin. This question asks to identify the most cost-effective and easiest lateration method when implementing location services with a fingerprinting approach.
Question
When use fingerprinting method, which is the least cost , easiest lateration to use? the options were :TDOA , cell of origin , VOR , )
Options
- Acell of origin
How the community answered
(50 responses)- A100% (50)
Why each option
This question asks to identify the most cost-effective and easiest lateration method when implementing location services with a fingerprinting approach.
Cell of Origin (COO) is considered the least costly and easiest lateration method for location determination, especially when combined with a fingerprinting technique. COO simply identifies a device's location based on its association with a known network access point or cell tower, requiring minimal additional infrastructure or complex signal processing. This simplicity reduces implementation and maintenance costs compared to more advanced lateration methods.
Concept tested: Location services lateration methods comparison-cost and ease
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/mse/10-0/location/guide/b_Cisco_CMX_10_0_Location_Analytics_Guide/b_Cisco_CMX_10_0_Location_Analytics_Guide_chapter_011.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.