300-360 · Question #120
A customer wants to upgrade their current wireless infrastructure to support wireless voice capabilities. When using a voice readiness assessment tool, the customer notes that multiple areas have…
The correct answer is A. Reduce the maximum threshold on the voice readiness tool to -67 dBm. The correct resolution is to set the voice readiness tool's maximum threshold to -67 dBm (A), which is the proper Cisco standard for VoWLAN coverage. If the tool was previously configured with a stricter threshold (e.g., -65 dBm), areas near the coverage boundary would…
Question
A customer wants to upgrade their current wireless infrastructure to support wireless voice capabilities. When using a voice readiness assessment tool, the customer notes that multiple areas have failed to meet the requirements How should the customer resolve this issue?
Options
- AReduce the maximum threshold on the voice readiness tool to -67 dBm.
- BPerform a site survey to position access points in the facility?
- CEnsure that there is a 1 to 5 ratio of monitor mode to local mode access points
- DIncrease the power on all the access points to 25mW or more.
How the community answered
(42 responses)- A81% (34)
- B12% (5)
- C2% (1)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
The correct resolution is to set the voice readiness tool's maximum threshold to -67 dBm (A), which is the proper Cisco standard for VoWLAN coverage. If the tool was previously configured with a stricter threshold (e.g., -65 dBm), areas near the coverage boundary would incorrectly fail. Adjusting to -67 dBm aligns the assessment with the correct voice-grade RSSI standard. Performing a new site survey (B) addresses physical AP placement but is a larger effort that may not be needed if the tool was simply misconfigured. A 1:5 monitor-to-local AP ratio (C) is unrelated to coverage failures. Increasing power to 25 mW or more (D) may worsen co-channel interference rather than resolve readiness failures.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.