nerdexam
Cisco

300-320 · Question #737

You have a policy that must differentiate between 80 distinct traffic classes on a router. Which feature do you use for marking?

The correct answer is C. QoS groups. QoS groups are an internal router marking construct with a value range large enough to represent more than 64 distinct classes, making them the only option capable of differentiating 80 traffic classes.

Advanced Addressing and Routing Solutions

Question

You have a policy that must differentiate between 80 distinct traffic classes on a router. Which feature do you use for marking?

Options

  • ACoS
  • BDSCP
  • CQoS groups
  • DIP precedence

How the community answered

(33 responses)
  • A
    6% (2)
  • B
    12% (4)
  • C
    55% (18)
  • D
    27% (9)

Why each option

QoS groups are an internal router marking construct with a value range large enough to represent more than 64 distinct classes, making them the only option capable of differentiating 80 traffic classes.

ACoS

CoS (Class of Service) is encoded in 3 bits of the 802.1Q VLAN tag, providing only 8 distinct values (0-7) - far below the 80 classes required.

BDSCP

DSCP uses 6 bits in the IP Differentiated Services field, providing 64 possible values (0-63) - still insufficient to differentiate 80 distinct classes.

CQoS groupsCorrect

QoS groups are a Cisco IOS internal marking mechanism not constrained by the bit width of any standard protocol header field - they can be assigned values sufficient to distinguish 80 or more distinct traffic classes depending on the platform. Unlike DSCP (limited to 64 values by its 6-bit field) or CoS and IP Precedence (limited to 8 values each by their 3-bit fields), QoS groups are applied locally on the router and used in policy-map class matching, making them the only listed option that can represent 80 distinct classes. Traffic is classified into a QoS group and then acted upon by subsequent policy stages.

DIP precedence

IP Precedence uses 3 bits in the IP Type of Service byte, yielding only 8 distinct values (0-7) - far fewer than the 80 classes required.

Concept tested: QoS groups for marking beyond DSCP and CoS value limits

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/qos_mqc/configuration/xe-16/qos-mqc-xe-16-book/qos-qos-policy-prop.html

Topics

#QoS marking#traffic classes#DSCP limits#QoS groups

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-320 Practice