300-320 · Question #180
Which IPv6 transition model should be utilized when two or more independent transition mechanisms are required?
The correct answer is D. hybrid. The hybrid IPv6 transition model is specifically defined for scenarios where two or more independent transition mechanisms must be combined into a single coherent strategy.
Question
Which IPv6 transition model should be utilized when two or more independent transition mechanisms are required?
Options
- Atunneling
- Bdual stack
- Cservice block
- Dhybrid
- Emanual
How the community answered
(58 responses)- B3% (2)
- C2% (1)
- D90% (52)
- E5% (3)
Why each option
The hybrid IPv6 transition model is specifically defined for scenarios where two or more independent transition mechanisms must be combined into a single coherent strategy.
Tunneling (e.g., 6in4, GRE) is a single transition mechanism that encapsulates IPv6 packets within IPv4 headers; it does not by itself combine multiple independent mechanisms.
Dual stack runs both IPv4 and IPv6 natively on devices and is itself one transition mechanism, not a framework for combining multiple mechanisms.
Service block is not a recognized standard IPv6 transition model in Cisco design frameworks.
The hybrid model deliberately combines multiple IPv6 transition techniques - for example, using dual stack on the core while deploying tunneling at branch sites - allowing organizations to apply the most appropriate mechanism to each part of the network simultaneously.
Manual tunneling is a specific single-mechanism approach for point-to-point IPv6-over-IPv4 tunnels and does not encompass multiple transition techniques.
Concept tested: IPv6 hybrid transition model combining multiple mechanisms
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Network_Virtualization/ipv6-solution.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.