nerdexam
Cisco

300-320 · Question #651

Which of the following statements are true about IS-IS route leaking? (Select two.) A. It is done at L1璍2 routers.

The correct answer is C. You can use route leaking to solve suboptimal routing. IS-IS route leaking is the process of redistributing Level 2 (backbone) routing information down into Level 1 (area) routing tables. Without route leaking, L1-only routers send all traffic to the nearest L1/L2 router for exit, which may not be the optimal path - route leaking…

Advanced Addressing and Routing Solutions

Question

Which of the following statements are true about IS-IS route leaking? (Select two.) A. It is done at L1璍2 routers.

Options

  • BFor a prefix to be leaked, it must exist in the routing table as IS-IS Level 1 route.
  • CYou can use route leaking to solve suboptimal routing.
  • DAn up/down bit in the CDP field is used.
  • EYou need to disable all loop protection mechanisms.

How the community answered

(26 responses)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    69% (18)
  • D
    8% (2)
  • E
    19% (5)

Explanation

IS-IS route leaking is the process of redistributing Level 2 (backbone) routing information down into Level 1 (area) routing tables. Without route leaking, L1-only routers send all traffic to the nearest L1/L2 router for exit, which may not be the optimal path - route leaking solves this suboptimal routing problem by giving L1 routers visibility into specific L2 destinations (C is correct). The up/down bit is set in the IP reachability TLV field (not the CDP field as stated in D) to mark leaked routes and prevent them from being re-leaked back upward, which would cause loops. Option B is incorrect - route leaking moves L2 routes downward into L1 areas, not L1 routes upward. Option E is incorrect - the loop prevention mechanism (the up/down bit) must remain active and must not be disabled.

Topics

#IS-IS route leaking#L1/L2 routers#suboptimal routing#up/down bit

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 300-320 Practice