Which of the following is true regarding the effect of EIGRP queries on the network design?

When a route is lost and no feasible successor exists, EIGRP sends queries to all neighbors; if those queries propagate unchecked across a large network, routers can enter a Stuck-in-Active (SIA) state waiting for replies, causing route flaps and extended convergence times that represent the most significant stability risk in EIGRP network design.

Feasible successors prevent queries only locally on the router that holds them; queries can still propagate beyond neighbors that lack a feasible successor, so the query scope problem remains even with feasible successors present.

EIGRP stubs reduce query scope but are a mitigation technique, not an elimination of the problem; the statement incorrectly implies queries only matter when stubs are absent and ignores the broader convergence impact.