nerdexam
Broadcom-VMware

2V0-622D · Question #267

On a cluster of ESXi 6.5 hosts, a small number of virtual machines have much larger resource requirements than others. Some hosts have a large number of virtual machines while others have very few. Th

The correct answer is A. Virtual machines will be moved without regard to resource contention in the cluster, and the. Enabling DRS VM Distribution balances VMs by count per host, not by resource consumption, so VMs can be relocated to hosts that then become resource-contended because the feature ignores actual workload weight.

Section 5 – Administer and Protect vSphere 6.5 Resources

Question

On a cluster of ESXi 6.5 hosts, a small number of virtual machines have much larger resource requirements than others. Some hosts have a large number of virtual machines while others have very few. The administrator enables DRS with DRS VM distribution to evenly balance the number of virtual machines on each host. Which will be the outcome?

Options

  • AVirtual machines will be moved without regard to resource contention in the cluster, and the
  • BVirtual machines will not change hosts unless they are power-cycled or vMotioned manually.
  • CVirtual machines will not be moved if it results in severe resource contention in the cluster, and
  • DDRS VM distribution will not evenly balance the number of virtual machines on each host unless

How the community answered

(25 responses)
  • A
    68% (17)
  • B
    4% (1)
  • C
    20% (5)
  • D
    8% (2)

Why each option

Enabling DRS VM Distribution balances VMs by count per host, not by resource consumption, so VMs can be relocated to hosts that then become resource-contended because the feature ignores actual workload weight.

AVirtual machines will be moved without regard to resource contention in the cluster, and theCorrect

DRS VM Distribution equalizes the number of virtual machines per host without evaluating each VM's CPU or memory footprint. In a cluster where some VMs have much larger resource requirements, an even VM count spread can overload certain hosts, meaning migrations occur without regard to resulting resource contention - exactly the behavior described in this answer.

BVirtual machines will not change hosts unless they are power-cycled or vMotioned manually.

Enabling DRS VM Distribution actively triggers vMotion operations to equalize VM counts; VMs do not stay on their current hosts unless the per-host count is already balanced.

CVirtual machines will not be moved if it results in severe resource contention in the cluster, and

DRS VM Distribution does not evaluate resource contention as a blocking condition - it only checks VM count, so it will not suppress moves that cause severe resource pressure.

DDRS VM distribution will not evenly balance the number of virtual machines on each host unless

VM Distribution operates independently of other cluster settings; it does not require specific migration thresholds or minimum cluster sizes to function.

Concept tested: DRS VM Distribution ignoring resource contention on migration

Source: https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/7.0/com.vmware.vsphere.resmgmt.doc/GUID-297C4D37-7AED-4F41-87C9-2B6D0D93F45C.html

Topics

#DRS VM distribution#resource contention#VM placement#cluster balancing

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 2V0-622D Practice