2V0-622 · Question #193
An administrator wants to set a non-default isolation address of 192.168.1.2 for High Availability. Which advanced setting would accomplish this task?
The correct answer is A. Das.isolationaddress0=192.168.1.2. The vSphere HA advanced setting Das.isolationaddress0 is the correct parameter for defining a custom non-default isolation address used by hosts to detect network isolation.
Question
An administrator wants to set a non-default isolation address of 192.168.1.2 for High Availability. Which advanced setting would accomplish this task?
Options
- ADas.isolationaddress0=192.168.1.2
- BDas.useisolationaddress0=192.168.1.2
- CDas.defaultisolationaddress0=192.168.1.2
- DDas.haisolationaddress0=192.168.1.2
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A93% (26)
- B4% (1)
- D4% (1)
Why each option
The vSphere HA advanced setting Das.isolationaddress0 is the correct parameter for defining a custom non-default isolation address used by hosts to detect network isolation.
Das.isolationaddress0 is the officially supported vSphere HA advanced parameter for specifying a non-default isolation address, where the numeric suffix allows administrators to define multiple isolation addresses (0, 1, 2, etc.). Each ESXi host in the HA cluster pings this address to distinguish true host failure from network isolation before taking remediation action.
Das.useisolationaddress0 is not a valid vSphere HA advanced setting; the correct parameter name does not include the 'use' prefix.
Das.defaultisolationaddress0 is not a valid vSphere HA advanced setting; no such parameter exists in the vSphere HA configuration options.
Das.haisolationaddress0 is not a valid vSphere HA advanced setting; the correct parameter name omits the 'ha' infix and uses Das.isolationaddress0 directly.
Concept tested: vSphere HA custom isolation address advanced setting
Source: https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/6.0/com.vmware.vsphere.avail.doc/GUID-E0161CB5-BD3F-425F-A7E0-BF83B005FECA.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.